2015
June Quarterly General Meeting
CBPOA
Quarterly General Meeting June 3rd 2015 Beecher Place
Directors
Present: Mark, Carolyn, Bruce, David, Derrick.
Chair: Erik.
Call
to order: 7:30 pm
1. Adoption of minutes of March 15th Meeting: Moved: Steve Chitty. Seconded: Perry Lewis. Passed.
1. Adoption of minutes of March 15th Meeting: Moved: Steve Chitty. Seconded: Perry Lewis. Passed.
Business arising : None.
2. Presentation: Communities and Coal. Paula Williams and Sally Stewart.
The
work started 3 years ago – opposing the expansion of Surrey Docks coal
terminal, (with consequential increase in coal trains from the US coming
through Crescent Beach). Have support from Eco Justice. Last August the Port
approved the expansion and we are challenging this decision on the basis of:
biased decision process; failed to take Climate Change into consideration; CEO
did not have authority to approve. Had our first appearance in Court yesterday
– the Port wanted to delay the case to 2016 but the Judge said “no” and ordered
the Port to produce some requested documents by Friday.
Also,
taking a middle ground approach through the Federal Court system - towards
having the Port ordered to conduct an Independent, Comprehensive Health
Assessment. Have support from the cities of Surrey, Delta, Langley, New
Westminster and other groups such as School Districts and the Nurses Union.
The
lawyers’ time is covered by Eco Justice. However, need to raise funds for
incidentals. Raised $22K towards a target of $30K. Can support our legal
challenge by donating to http://www.gofundme.com/port2court. To learn more go to:
www.taketheport2court.ca and WWW.COMMUNITIESANDCOAL.COM
3. Reports:
Treasurer: no report
Membership: Bruce reported beginning to prepare for this year’s campaign
for July and August. Seeing willing support from canvassers. Hoping for a good
membership response from the Village. If someone would like to become a canvasser, can readily find
some streets.
4.
Old business:
Erik
reported talking to people about rail issues, (the frequency of knuckle
failures) at the Port Metro Vancouver AGM. The City of Surrey motion to seek to
extend the slow speed boundary is good news. Jeff Scott of Transport Canada
will talk to the railroad - but it is a slow process.
Bruce
reported on a meeting earlier in the day with City of Surrey representatives at
the gravel parking area coming down to the rail crossing. Following the years
of work that Malcolm has done on whistle cessation the City of Surrey is
becoming supportive and the Traffic Department is considering installing a
camera at the entrance to the village to monitor the rail crossing. This would be linked into their Traffic Centre data gathering
system: to provide early information to first responders and others in the
event of crossing issues and also provide full information on the effects of any
access/traffic disruption (duration, frequency, extent, etc.) – information that can be used by the City to support
discussions with Transport Canada and the railroad.
As
installing a camera will involve replacing the existing speed indicator sign pole
with a taller one, (for reasons of camera signal transmission), the City
representatives wanted to discuss our thoughts on replacement pole positioning
and potentially adding a street light to the replacement pole. Ideas were exchanged, including considering
how potential crossing changes in the event of whistle cessation might affect
the pole relocation.
In
answer to a question, Erik responded that it is looking positive to move
forward with whistle cessation. If City engagement with BNSF reaches an impasse
then they can go to Transport Canada and ask for mediation. BNSF is very well
aware of our stretch of line and it seems like there is motivation to move
forward. When successful it would be a template for others.
Question:
“does anything come along with whistle cessation”? In Canada it would involve a two gate system at the crossing
potentially with roadway medians/islands to prevent cheating the gates; in the
States it is a four gate crossing. Would cessation be 24 hours or evenings? It
will be semi-volountary with the engineer sounding the horn if warranted for
safety.
Henry
Mandell would like the flashing yellow lights removed and replaced with a car
travel speed indicator display.
Under
contract with the City, the newly painted paddleboard rental hut is in place to
the right of the boat launch. They
want to also run summer Kids programs/activities.
5.
Land Use Plan (Official
Community Plan -OCP).
As
per the Notice for the meeting, the amended motion that was tabled at the March
Quarterly Meeting was brought forward for a vote.
Amended
Motion: Whereas pressures on
our Community continue to grow, many of which were never anticipated by the
1999 Crescent Beach OCP, (Crescent Beach Land Use Plan), and the Blackie Spit
OCP, (Blackie Spit Master Plan), then the Crescent Beach Property Owners
Association requests the City of Surrey to first allocate the resources needed
to update the 1999 Plans and then facilitate the process.
Mark led the discussion with a
presentation outlining the background and the changes that have occurred within
and around the Community since 1999 together with an outlook for continuing
change out to 2030, including statistical data on population and traffic growth
for the City and Region.
In
response to an invitation from Mark, Barb, who was involved with the 1999 OCP
planning process talked from the floor about the process that was used to
facilitate Community engagement/input and the desire of residents to preserve
the “funky character” of the village.
Questions
were raised about are there adverse consequences to re-opening the existing
plans? Why can’t we address the present traffic volume/parking issues without
reopening the plan? Having read the plans they seem to allow for covering off
today’s pressing issues. If we reopen, other stakeholders could gain and we,
the residents lose. Why can’t we begin to deal with pressing issues now?
The
Chair observed how the City is organised by Departments such as, Engineering,
Traffic, Parks and Planning and cross communication does not necessarily happen
readily. We deal singly with Traffic, Parks etc. on specific items and we also need
to have City Planning involved for the overall umbrella view in order to
capture our needs and future outlook in budgets and plans which then form the
basis for action and implementation.
Call
for the vote: For 25 Against 7
Passed.
Following
the vote the Chair gave assurance that today’s pressing needs are being worked
and will continue to be worked with the City departments. Mark indicated that conversations were
already underway with respect to the recent letter from the City re. requiring
removal of private parking signs. Surrey currently does not have resident only
parking areas.
6. New Business.
Two
attendees talked passionately about their observation of and experience with
the ramp up in crime and bad behaviour, in the Bayview/ Beach area. Of further concern was the observed
absence of consequence when people who are drinking, using and/or selling drugs
are approached by Enforcement Officers.
The preferred approach appears to be one of attempting to educate those
involved.
A
Block Watch group has been established in the area.
Motion
from the chair: That the CBPOA write a letter to the RCMP and the Fire Department
requesting the Block Watch, the RCMP and the Fire Department work together to address the problems of
illegal activity and devise incentives to resolve the issues. All in agreement.
Ron
Sorenson talked about his observations of low flying light aircraft over the village.
The legal minimum height is 1000ft over populated areas. He has tracked light
aircraft originating from the King George Airpark as low as 200 to 400 ft. Seen
two recent ultra-light incidents in the area, (one crash and one emergency
landing on the roadway). Given the heightened safety concerns, Ron is
encouraging Transport Canada to go to King George Airpark and talk to them.
Adjourn: proposed: Trevor seconded: Bob. Meeting adjourned 9:30.
No comments:
Post a Comment